Houchins v. Kqed, Inc.
438 U.S. 1 · Decided June 26, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Houchins v. Kqed, Inc. was decided on June 26, 1978 by a vote of 4–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion announcing the judgment of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 438 U.S. 1 · 98 S. Ct. 2588 · 57 L. Ed. 2d 553 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 11
- Docket number
- 76-1310
- Decided
- June 26, 1978
- Argued
- November 29, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 4–3
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Judgment of the Court | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Thurgood Marshall, Harry A. Blackmun.
Full case caption
Houchins, Sheriff of the County of Alameda, California v. Kqed, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-138, docket 1977-138-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District
- Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees
- Marchioro v. Chaney
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
- Pinkus v. United States
- First National Bank of Boston v. BellottiLaw held unconstitutional
- Friedman v. Rogers
- Herbert v. Lando
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- New York v. Cathedral AcademyLaw held unconstitutional
- McDaniel v. PatyLaw held unconstitutional
- First National Bank of Boston v. BellottiLaw held unconstitutional
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Pinkus v. United States
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error