Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
436 U.S. 447 · Decided May 30, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. was decided on May 30, 1978 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, attorneys” in the Attorneys area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 436 U.S. 447 · 98 S. Ct. 1912 · 56 L. Ed. 2d 444 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 29
- Docket number
- 76-1650
- Decided
- May 30, 1978
- Argued
- January 16, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, attorneys
- Issue area
- Attorneys
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr..
Full case caption
Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-093, docket 1977-093-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, attorneys”
- In re Primus
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaLaw held unconstitutional
- In re R. M. J.Law held unconstitutional
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioLaw held unconstitutional
- United Transportation Union v. State Bar of Michigan
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar AssociationLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Pinkus v. United States
- Houchins v. Kqed, Inc.
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- First National Bank of Boston v. BellottiLaw held unconstitutional
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District
Same Term, same area (Attorneys)
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error