Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
433 U.S. 562 · Decided June 28, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. was decided on June 28, 1977 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Libel and privacy (false light)” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 433 U.S. 562 · 97 S. Ct. 2849 · 53 L. Ed. 2d 965 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 145
- Docket number
- 76-577
- Decided
- June 28, 1977
- Argued
- April 25, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Libel and privacy (false light)
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-177, docket 1976-177-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Libel and privacy (false light)”
- Nixon v. Administrator of General Services
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnLaw held unconstitutional
- Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.
- Time, Inc. v. Hill
- The Florida Star v. B. J. F.Law held unconstitutional
- Bartnicki v. VopperLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaLaw held unconstitutional
- National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
- Ward v. Illinois
- Splawn v. California
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroLaw held unconstitutional
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. District Court in and for Oklahoma County
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Parker Seal Co. v. Cummins
- City of Madison Joint School District No. 8 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle
- Marks v. United States
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. District Court in and for Oklahoma County
- Wooley v. Maynard et Ux.Law held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error