Friedman v. Rogers
440 U.S. 1 · Decided February 21, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Friedman v. Rogers was decided on February 21, 1979 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 440 U.S. 1 · 99 S. Ct. 887 · 59 L. Ed. 2d 100 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 57
- Docket number
- 77-1163
- Decided
- February 21, 1979
- Argued
- November 8, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, excluding attorneys
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Friedman et al. v. Rogers et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-035, docket 1978-035-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys”
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroLaw held unconstitutional
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoLaw held unconstitutional
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Altered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Bigelow v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District
- Herbert v. Lando
- Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Law held unconstitutional
- Wolston v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District
- Herbert v. Lando
- Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees
- Marchioro v. Chaney
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Law held unconstitutional
- Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error