First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
435 U.S. 765 · Decided April 26, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti was decided on April 26, 1978 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Campaign spending” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 435 U.S. 765 · 98 S. Ct. 1407 · 55 L. Ed. 2d 707 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 83
- Docket number
- 76-1172
- Decided
- April 26, 1978
- Argued
- November 9, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Campaign spending
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
First National Bank of Boston et al. v. Bellotti, Attorney General of Massachusetts
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-073, docket 1977-073-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Campaign spending”
- Buckley v. ValeoLaw held unconstitutional
- Cort v. Ash
- California Medical Association v. Federal Election Commission
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
- Citizens Against Rent Control/coalition for Fair Housing v. City of BerkeleyLaw held unconstitutional
- Bread Political Action Committee v. Federal Election Commission
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Pinkus v. United States
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.
- Houchins v. Kqed, Inc.
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- New York v. Cathedral AcademyLaw held unconstitutional
- McDaniel v. PatyLaw held unconstitutional
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaLaw held unconstitutional
- Pinkus v. United States
- Houchins v. Kqed, Inc.
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error