Marchioro v. Chaney
442 U.S. 191 · Decided June 4, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Marchioro v. Chaney was decided on June 4, 1979 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “First Amendment, miscellaneous” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 442 U.S. 191 · 99 S. Ct. 2243 · 60 L. Ed. 2d 816 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 22
- Docket number
- 78-647
- Decided
- June 4, 1979
- Argued
- March 26, 1979
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- First Amendment, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (association)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr..
Full case caption
Marchioro et al. v. Chaney et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-110, docket 1978-110-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “First Amendment, miscellaneous”
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Law held unconstitutional
- Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District
- Brown v. Glines
- Secretary of the Navy v. Huff
- Snepp v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (association)
- In re Primus
- Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
- Citizens Against Rent Control/coalition for Fair Housing v. City of BerkeleyLaw held unconstitutional
- Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic Party
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeLaw held unconstitutional
- Kusper v. PontikesLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District
- Friedman v. Rogers
- Herbert v. Lando
- Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Law held unconstitutional
- Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error