United States v. John Doe, Inc. I
481 U.S. 102 · Decided April 21, 1987 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. John Doe, Inc. I was decided on April 21, 1987 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 481 U.S. 102 · 107 S. Ct. 1656 · 95 L. Ed. 2d 94 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 1810
- Docket number
- 85-1613
- Decided
- April 21, 1987
- Argued
- January 12, 1987
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority |
Did not participate: Byron R. White.
Full case caption
United States v. John Doe, Inc. I, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1986-070, docket 1986-070-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- Tanner v. United States
- Bourjaily v. United States
- Huddleston v. United States
- United States v. Mechanik
- United States v. LaneAltered precedent
- United States v. Young
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Young v. United States ex Rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A.
- Frederick Mathews v. United States
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
- United States v. Benchimol
- United States v. Gagnon
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Colorado v. Connelly
- Griffith v. Kentucky
- Colorado v. Bertine
- Connecticut v. Barrett
- California v. Brown
- Colorado v. Spring
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error