United States v. Lane
474 U.S. 438 · Decided January 27, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
United States v. Lane was decided on January 27, 1986 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 474 U.S. 438 · 106 S. Ct. 725 · 88 L. Ed. 2d 814 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 48
- Docket number
- 84-744
- Decided
- January 27, 1986
- Argued
- October 9, 1985
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Lane et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-029, docket 1985-029-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- United States v. Mechanik
- United States v. Young
- Luce v. United States
- United States v. Abel
- United States v. John Doe, Inc. I
- Tanner v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. Benchimol
- United States v. Gagnon
- Young v. United States ex Rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A.
- Frederick Mathews v. United States
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Delaware v. Fensterer
- Lanier v. South Carolina
- Pennsylvania v. Goldhammer
- Hill v. Lockhart
- Heath v. Alabama
- Miller v. Fenton
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error