United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
498 U.S. 292 · Decided January 22, 1991 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc. was decided on January 22, 1991 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 498 U.S. 292 · 111 S. Ct. 722 · 112 L. Ed. 2d 795 · 1991 U.S. LEXIS 489
- Docket number
- 89-1436
- Decided
- January 22, 1991
- Argued
- October 29, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Discovery and inspection in criminal cases
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1990-025, docket 1990-025-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases”
- United States v. Zolin
- United States Department of Justice v. Julian
- Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
- Curtis Lee Kyles v. John P. Whitley
- Tana Wood v. Dwayne Earl Bartholomew
- United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- William J. Burns v. United States
- Michael Crosby v. United States
- Gloria Zafiro v. United States
- United States v. Guy W. Olano, Jr.
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
- Frederick Mathews v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Robert Lee Shell v. Mississippi
- Tommy Cage v. Louisiana
- R. Dobie Langenkamp v. C. A. Culp
- Raymond J. Moskal, Sr. v. United States
- Robert S. Minnick v. Mississippi
- Richard Demarest v. James
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error