Frederick Mathews v. United States
485 U.S. 58 · Decided February 24, 1988 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Frederick Mathews v. United States was decided on February 24, 1988 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Subconstitutional fair procedure, entrapment” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 485 U.S. 58 · 108 S. Ct. 883 · 99 L. Ed. 2d 54 · 1988 U.S. LEXIS 943
- Docket number
- 86-6109
- Decided
- February 24, 1988
- Argued
- December 2, 1987
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Subconstitutional fair procedure, entrapment
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Anthony M. Kennedy.
Full case caption
Frederick Mathews v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1987-036, docket 1987-036-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Subconstitutional fair procedure, entrapment”
- Keith Jacobson v. United States
- Hampton v. United States
- United States v. Russell
- Sherman v. United States
- Masciale v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
- Young v. United States ex Rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A.
- United States v. John Doe, Inc. I
- United States v. Mechanik
- United States v. LaneAltered precedent
- United States v. Benchimol
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Carpenter v. United States
- Yates v. Aiken
- Lowenfield v. Phelps
- Taylor v. Illinois
- United States v. Owens
- United States v. Thomas O. Robinson, Jr.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error