Bourjaily v. United States
483 U.S. 171 · Decided June 23, 1987 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Bourjaily v. United States was decided on June 23, 1987 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 483 U.S. 171 · 107 S. Ct. 2775 · 97 L. Ed. 2d 144 · 1987 U.S. LEXIS 2874
- Docket number
- 85-6725
- Decided
- June 23, 1987
- Argued
- April 1, 1987
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Evidence
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority |
Full case caption
Bourjaily v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1986-143, docket 1986-143-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- Tanner v. United States
- United States v. John Doe, Inc. I
- Huddleston v. United States
- United States v. Mechanik
- United States v. LaneAltered precedent
- United States v. Young
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Evidence
- Beech Aircraft Corporation v. Rainey
- Green v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.
- United States v. Zolin
- United States v. Anthony Salerno
- William Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- United States v. Gillock
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Colorado v. Connelly
- Griffith v. Kentucky
- Colorado v. Bertine
- Connecticut v. Barrett
- California v. Brown
- Colorado v. Spring
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error