Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
487 U.S. 250 · Decided June 22, 1988 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States was decided on June 22, 1988 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Subconstitutional fair procedure, miscellaneous” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 487 U.S. 250 · 108 S. Ct. 2369 · 101 L. Ed. 2d 228 · 1988 U.S. LEXIS 2866
- Docket number
- 87-578
- Decided
- June 22, 1988
- Argued
- April 27, 1988
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Subconstitutional fair procedure, miscellaneous
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1987-135, docket 1987-135-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Subconstitutional fair procedure, miscellaneous”
- Gomez v. United States
- Ray v. United States
- Richard Demarest v. James
- United States v. Darlina K. France
- Peretz v. United States
- United States v. Powell
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Frederick Mathews v. United States
- Young v. United States ex Rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A.
- United States v. John Doe, Inc. I
- United States v. Mechanik
- United States v. LaneAltered precedent
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Carpenter v. United States
- Yates v. Aiken
- Lowenfield v. Phelps
- Taylor v. Illinois
- United States v. Owens
- United States v. Thomas O. Robinson, Jr.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error