United States v. Alphonso Vonn
535 U.S. 55 · Decided March 4, 2002 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Alphonso Vonn was decided on March 4, 2002 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 535 U.S. 55 · 122 S. Ct. 1043 · 152 L. Ed. 2d 90 · 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1377
- Docket number
- 00-973
- Decided
- March 4, 2002
- Argued
- November 6, 2001
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Alphonso Vonn
SCDB identifiers: case 2001-029, docket 2001-029-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
- United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar
- Manuel Dejesus Peguero v. United States
- Ivan Eberhart v. United States
- United States v. Robert E. Hyde
- Joyce B. Johnson v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez
- United States v. Vickie S. Cabrales
- William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley
- United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong
- Irizarry v. United States
- James Benjamin Puckett v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- United States v. Mark James Knights
- William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina
- United States v. Ralph Arvizu
- Walter Mickens, Jr. v. John Taylor
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
- Alabama v. Lereed Shelton
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error