United States v. Vickie S. Cabrales
524 U.S. 1 · Decided June 1, 1998 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Vickie S. Cabrales was decided on June 1, 1998 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Venue” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 524 U.S. 1 · 118 S. Ct. 1772 · 141 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1998 U.S. LEXIS 3568
- Docket number
- 97-643
- Decided
- June 1, 1998
- Argued
- April 29, 1998
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Venue
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Vickie S. Cabrales
SCDB identifiers: case 1997-073, docket 1997-073-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Venue”
- United States v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno
- Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Company, Etc.
- Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. William D. Ford and Thomas L. Johnson
- Ferens et Ux. v. John Deere Co.
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Manuel Dejesus Peguero v. United States
- William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley
- United States v. Robert E. Hyde
- Joyce B. Johnson v. United States
- United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar
- United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Melvin Jefferson v. City of Tarrant
- General Electric Company v. Robert K. Joiner et Ux.
- City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons
- George G. Rogers v. United States
- Regions Hospital v. Donna E. Shalala
- Mary Anna Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error