United States v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez
542 U.S. 74 · Decided June 14, 2004 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez was decided on June 14, 2004 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Plea bargaining” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 542 U.S. 74 · 124 S. Ct. 2333 · 159 L. Ed. 2d 157 · 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4177
- Docket number
- 03-167
- Decided
- June 14, 2004
- Argued
- April 21, 2004
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- David H. Souter
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Plea bargaining
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez
SCDB identifiers: case 2003-071, docket 2003-071-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Plea bargaining”
- Margaret Bradshaw v. John David Stumpf
- United States v. Angela Ruiz
- James Benjamin Puckett v. United States
- Burt v. Titlow
- Salvador Godinez v. Richard Allan Moran
- Al C. Parke v. Ricky Harold Raley
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Ivan Eberhart v. United States
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
- United States v. Alphonso Vonn
- Irizarry v. United States
- United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar
- Manuel Dejesus Peguero v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Michael Yarborough v. Lionel E. Gentry
- Betty Mitchell v. Gregory Esparza
- United States v. Lashawn Lowell Banks
- Maryland v. Joseph Jermaine Pringle
- Hernan O'Ryan Castro v. United States
- Illinois v. Robert S. Lidster
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error