William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley
520 U.S. 899 · Decided June 9, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley was decided on June 9, 1997 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 520 U.S. 899 · 117 S. Ct. 1793 · 138 L. Ed. 2d 97 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 3548
- Docket number
- 96-6133
- Decided
- June 9, 1997
- Argued
- April 14, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Discovery and inspection in criminal cases
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley, Warden
SCDB identifiers: case 1996-068, docket 1996-068-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Discovery and inspection in criminal cases”
- Swidler & Berlin and James Hamilton v. United States
- United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong
- Tana Wood v. Dwayne Earl Bartholomew
- Curtis Lee Kyles v. John P. Whitley
- United States v. John Bass
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. Robert E. Hyde
- Joyce B. Johnson v. United States
- United States v. Vickie S. Cabrales
- Charles Carlisle v. United States
- Joseph Libretti v. United States
- Manuel Dejesus Peguero v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- California v. Kenneth Duane Roy
- Ohio v. Robert D. Robinette
- United States v. Vernon Watts
- Johnny Lynn Old Chief v. United States
- Maryland v. Jerry Lee Wilson
- Kenneth Lynce v. Hamilton MathisLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error