United States v. Mark James Knights
534 U.S. 112 · Decided December 10, 2001 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Mark James Knights was decided on December 10, 2001 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 534 U.S. 112 · 122 S. Ct. 587 · 151 L. Ed. 2d 497 · 2001 U.S. LEXIS 10950
- Docket number
- 00-1260
- Decided
- December 10, 2001
- Argued
- November 6, 2001
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourth Amendment
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Mark James Knights
SCDB identifiers: case 2001-007, docket 2001-007-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- United States v. Ralph Arvizu
- Danny Lee Kyllo v. United States
- United States v. Christopher Drayton and Clifton Brown, Jr.
- Kennedy D. Kirk v. Louisiana
- Crystal M. Ferguson v. City of Charleston
- Illinois v. Charles McArthur
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourth Amendment
- Board of Education of Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County v. Lindsay Earls
- Gail Atwater v. City of Lago Vista
- City of Indianapolis v. James EdmondLaw held unconstitutional
- Maryland v. Joseph Jermaine Pringle
- Illinois v. Robert S. Lidster
- Jeff Groh v. Joseph R. Ramirez
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- William Arthur Kelly v. South Carolina
- United States v. Ralph Arvizu
- United States v. Alphonso Vonn
- Walter Mickens, Jr. v. John Taylor
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
- Alabama v. Lereed Shelton
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error