United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar
528 U.S. 304 · Decided January 19, 2000 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar was decided on January 19, 2000 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 528 U.S. 304 · 120 S. Ct. 774 · 145 L. Ed. 2d 792 · 2000 U.S. LEXIS 821
- Docket number
- 98-1255
- Decided
- January 19, 2000
- Argued
- November 29, 1999
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Special concurrence | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar
SCDB identifiers: case 1999-024, docket 1999-024-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- Manuel Dejesus Peguero v. United States
- United States v. Alphonso Vonn
- United States v. Leonard CottonAltered precedent
- United States v. Robert E. Hyde
- Joyce B. Johnson v. United States
- Charles Carlisle v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. Vickie S. Cabrales
- William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley
- United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong
- United States v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez
- Irizarry v. United States
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- James Michael Flippo v. West Virginia
- New York v. Michael Hill
- Illinois v. William aka Sam Wardlow
- Salvador Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California
- Lonnie Weeks, Jr. v. Ronald J. Angelone
- Ernest C. Roe v. Lucio Flores-Ortega
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error