Joseph Libretti v. United States
516 U.S. 29 · Decided November 7, 1995 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Joseph Libretti v. United States was decided on November 7, 1995 by a vote of 8–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 516 U.S. 29 · 116 S. Ct. 356 · 133 L. Ed. 2d 271 · 1995 U.S. LEXIS 7552
- Docket number
- 94-7427
- Decided
- November 7, 1995
- Argued
- October 3, 1995
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Joseph Libretti v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1995-005, docket 1995-005-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- Charles Carlisle v. United States
- United States v. Gary Mezzanatto
- Matthew Wayne Tome v. United States
- Fredel Williamson v. United States
- Joyce B. Johnson v. United States
- United States v. Robert E. Hyde
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong
- William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley
- United States v. Vickie S. Cabrales
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
- Frederick Mathews v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Tana Wood v. Dwayne Earl Bartholomew
- Lem Davis Tuggle, Jr. v. J. D. Netherland
- Carl Thompson v. Patrick Keohane
- Roland J. Bailey v. United States
- Meirl Gilbert Neal v. United States
- Tommy L. Rutledge v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error