Dunn v. Blumstein
405 U.S. 330 · Decided March 21, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Dunn v. Blumstein was decided on March 21, 1972 by a vote of 6–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 405 U.S. 330 · 92 S. Ct. 995 · 31 L. Ed. 2d 274 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 75
- Docket number
- 70-13
- Decided
- March 21, 1972
- Argued
- November 16, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–1
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- William O. Douglas
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Residency requirements
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Dunn, Governor of Tennessee, et al. v. Blumstein
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-075, docket 1971-075-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Residency requirements”
- Carter v. Stanton
- Marston v. Lewis
- Burns v. Fortson
- Rosario v. Rockefeller
- Kusper v. PontikesLaw held unconstitutional
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountyLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Eisenstadt v. BairdLaw held unconstitutional
- Alexander v. Louisiana
- Bullock v. CarterLaw held unconstitutional
- Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Law held unconstitutional
- Connor v. Williams
- Jefferson v. Hackney
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error