CaseTrail

Dunn v. Blumstein

405 U.S. 330 · Decided March 21, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Dunn v. Blumstein was decided on March 21, 1972 by a vote of 6–1. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
405 U.S. 330 · 92 S. Ct. 995 · 31 L. Ed. 2d 274 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 75
Docket number
70-13
Decided
March 21, 1972
Argued
November 16, 1971
Court era
Burger Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
6–1
Majority opinion
Thurgood Marshall
Opinion assigned by
William O. Douglas
How the case arrived
Appeal
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Altered precedent
Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice William O. DouglasMajority
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.Majority
Justice Potter StewartMajority
Justice Byron R. WhiteMajority
Justice Thurgood MarshallMajorityWrote an opinion
Chief Justice Warren E. BurgerDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Harry A. BlackmunSpecial concurrenceWrote an opinion

Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., William H. Rehnquist.

Full case caption

Dunn, Governor of Tennessee, et al. v. Blumstein

SCDB identifiers: case 1971-075, docket 1971-075-01.

Other cases on “Residency requirements”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error