Mayer v. City of Chicago
404 U.S. 189 · Decided December 13, 1971 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Mayer v. City of Chicago was decided on December 13, 1971 unanimously (7–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, transcripts” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 404 U.S. 189 · 92 S. Ct. 410 · 30 L. Ed. 2d 372 · 1971 U.S. LEXIS 298
- Docket number
- 70-5040
- Decided
- December 13, 1971
- Argued
- October 14, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, transcripts
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Mayer v. City of Chicago
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-020, docket 1971-020-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, transcripts”
- Britt v. North Carolina
- Wade v. Wilson
- Williams v. Oklahoma City
- Gardner v. California
- Roberts v. Lavallee
- United States v. Maccollom
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Schilb v. Kuebel
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Connor v. Williams
- Bullock v. CarterLaw held unconstitutional
- Dunn v. BlumsteinAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Eisenstadt v. BairdLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Britt v. North Carolina
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error