Rosario v. Rockefeller
410 U.S. 752 · Decided March 21, 1973 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Rosario v. Rockefeller was decided on March 21, 1973 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 410 U.S. 752 · 93 S. Ct. 1245 · 36 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1973 U.S. LEXIS 92
- Docket number
- 71-1371
- Decided
- March 21, 1973
- Argued
- December 13, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Residency requirements
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (association)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Rosario et al. v. Rockefeller, Governor of New York, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1972-082, docket 1972-082-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Residency requirements”
- Marston v. Lewis
- Burns v. Fortson
- Kusper v. PontikesLaw held unconstitutional
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Carter v. Stanton
- Dunn v. BlumsteinAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (association)
- Healy v. James
- United Transportation Union v. State Bar of Michigan
- Baird v. State Bar of Arizona
- In re Stolar
- Elrod v. Burns
- Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardLaw held unconstitutional
- District of Columbia v. Carter
- United States v. Kras
- Goosby v. Osser
- Gomez v. PerezLaw held unconstitutional
- Mahan v. HowellLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error