Jefferson v. Hackney
406 U.S. 535 · Decided May 30, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Jefferson v. Hackney was decided on May 30, 1972 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Poverty law, constitutional” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 406 U.S. 535 · 92 S. Ct. 1724 · 32 L. Ed. 2d 285 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 53
- Docket number
- 70-5064
- Decided
- May 30, 1972
- Argued
- February 22, 1972
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Poverty law, constitutional
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Jefferson et al. v. Hackney, Commissioner of Public Welfare, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-120, docket 1971-120-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Poverty law, constitutional”
- Townsend v. SwankLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MurryLaw held unconstitutional
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoLaw held unconstitutional
- James v. Valtierra
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Jackson v. IndianaLaw held unconstitutional
- James v. StrangeLaw held unconstitutional
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- Wright v. Council of the City of Emporia
- United States v. Scotland Neck City Board of EducationLaw held unconstitutional
- Peters v. Kiff
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error