Carter v. Stanton
405 U.S. 669 · Decided April 3, 1972 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Carter v. Stanton was decided on April 3, 1972 unanimously (7–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Residency requirements” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 405 U.S. 669 · 92 S. Ct. 1232 · 31 L. Ed. 2d 569 · 1972 U.S. LEXIS 71
- Docket number
- 70-5082
- Decided
- April 3, 1972
- Argued
- November 8, 1971
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Residency requirements
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., William H. Rehnquist.
Full case caption
Carter et al. v. Stanton, Director, Marion County Department of Public Welfare, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1971-088, docket 1971-088-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Residency requirements”
- Dunn v. BlumsteinAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Marston v. Lewis
- Burns v. Fortson
- Rosario v. Rockefeller
- Kusper v. PontikesLaw held unconstitutional
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountyLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- United States v. Indrelunas
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.
- Schmidt v. Lessard
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah
- United States v. Reynolds et Ux.
- Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Engelman v. Amos
- Doherty v. United States
- Schreiner v. United States
- Reed v. ReedLaw held unconstitutional
- Richardson v. Belcher
- Mayer v. City of Chicago
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error