American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah
414 U.S. 538 · Decided January 16, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah was decided on January 16, 1974 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 414 U.S. 538 · 94 S. Ct. 756 · 38 L. Ed. 2d 713 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 42
- Docket number
- 72-1195
- Decided
- January 16, 1974
- Argued
- November 12, 1973
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
American Pipe & Construction Co. et al. v. Utah et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1973-040, docket 1973-040-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Schmidt v. Lessard
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.
- Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
- Colgrove v. Battin, U.S. District Judge
- United States v. Indrelunas
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs
- Carter v. Stanton
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel
- United States v. Reynolds et Ux.
- First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co.
- Lee v. WashingtonLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Satiacum v. Washington
- Paschall v. Christie-Stewart, Inc.
- Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. Deaktor
- Foley v. Blair & Co., Inc.
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.
- Schmidt v. Lessard
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error