Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
137 S. Ct. 2042 · Decided June 26, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities was decided on June 26, 2017 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Untimely filing” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2016
Case details
- Citations
- 137 S. Ct. 2042 · 198 L. Ed. 2d 584 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 4062
- Docket number
- 16-373
- Decided
- June 26, 2017
- Argued
- April 17, 2017
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Untimely filing
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority |
Full case caption
Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
SCDB identifiers: case 2016-065, docket 2016-065-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Untimely filing”
- Artis v. District of Columbia
- China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh
- Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. U.S.
- Mata v. Lynch
- Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Cent. Pension Fund of Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs
- Cameron v. Emw Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C.
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Kokesh v. SEC
- Salman v. United States
- Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
- Merrill Lynch v. Manning
- Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Indus. Pension Fund
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.
- McLane Company v. EEOC
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger
- Manrique v. United States
- Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
- Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error