Merrill Lynch v. Manning
578 U.S. 374 · Decided May 16, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Merrill Lynch v. Manning was decided on May 16, 2016 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 578 U.S. 374 · 136 S. Ct. 1562 · 194 L. Ed. 2d 671 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3049
- Docket number
- 14-1132
- Decided
- May 16, 2016
- Argued
- December 1, 2015
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Elena Kagan
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Manning
SCDB identifiers: case 2015-022, docket 2015-022-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts”
- Dietz v. Bouldin
- Shapiro v. McManus
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger
- Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
- Wellness International Network v. Sharif
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Salman v. United States
- Kokesh v. SEC
- Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
- Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Indus. Pension Fund
- Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
- Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Shapiro v. McManus
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
- Duncan v. Owens
- Americold Logistics, LLC v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
- Wittman v. Personhuballah
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error