Kokesh v. SEC
137 S. Ct. 1635 · Decided June 5, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Kokesh v. SEC was decided on June 5, 2017 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2016
Case details
- Citations
- 137 S. Ct. 1635 · 198 L. Ed. 2d 86 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 3557
- Docket number
- 16-529
- Decided
- June 5, 2017
- Argued
- April 18, 2017
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority |
Full case caption
Kokesh v. SEC
SCDB identifiers: case 2016-066, docket 2016-066-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Digital Realty Trust v. Somers
- Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
- Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Indus. Pension Fund
- Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc.
- Liu v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
- Salman v. United States
- Merrill Lynch v. Manning
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Glen Billing
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Samsung Electronics v. Apple
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States
- Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp.
- Sca Hygiene Prods. Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC
- Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc.
- Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error