CaseTrail

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger

137 S. Ct. 1178 · Decided April 18, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger was decided on April 18, 2017 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
137 S. Ct. 1178 · 197 L. Ed. 2d 585 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2613
Docket number
15-1406
Decided
April 18, 2017
Argued
January 10, 2017
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Elena Kagan
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Type of law
No legal provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Neil M. Gorsuch.

Full case caption

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger

SCDB identifiers: case 2016-036, docket 2016-036-01.

Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts”

See all

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error