Manrique v. United States
137 S. Ct. 1266 · Decided April 19, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Manrique v. United States was decided on April 19, 2017 by a vote of 6–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2016
Case details
- Citations
- 137 S. Ct. 1266 · 197 L. Ed. 2d 599 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2616
- Docket number
- 15-7250
- Decided
- April 19, 2017
- Argued
- October 11, 2016
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Did not participate: Neil M. Gorsuch.
Full case caption
Manrique v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 2016-003, docket 2016-003-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals”
- McLane Company v. EEOC
- National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
- Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank
- United States v. Sineneng-Smith
- Republic of Iraq v. Jordan Beaty
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. Hif Bio, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
- Tharpe v. Sellers
- Hall v. Hall
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo
- Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.
- McLane Company v. EEOC
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger
- Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
- Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami
- Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error