William J. Burns v. United States
501 U.S. 129 · Decided June 13, 1991 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
William J. Burns v. United States was decided on June 13, 1991 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 501 U.S. 129 · 111 S. Ct. 2182 · 115 L. Ed. 2d 123 · 1991 U.S. LEXIS 3485
- Docket number
- 89-7260
- Decided
- June 13, 1991
- Argued
- December 3, 1990
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Thurgood Marshall
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
William J. Burns v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1990-102, docket 1990-102-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure”
- Michael Crosby v. United States
- Gloria Zafiro v. United States
- United States v. Guy W. Olano, Jr.
- Fredel Williamson v. United States
- Huddleston v. United States
- Matthew Wayne Tome v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
- Frederick Mathews v. United States
- Young v. United States ex Rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A.
- United States v. Christopher Lee Armstrong
- William Bracy v. Richard B. Gramley
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Robert Lee Shell v. Mississippi
- Tommy Cage v. Louisiana
- R. Dobie Langenkamp v. C. A. Culp
- Raymond J. Moskal, Sr. v. United States
- Robert S. Minnick v. Mississippi
- Richard Demarest v. James
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error