Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/american Express, Inc.
490 U.S. 477 · Decided May 15, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/american Express, Inc. was decided on May 15, 1989 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 490 U.S. 477 · 109 S. Ct. 1917 · 104 L. Ed. 2d 526 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 2397
- Docket number
- 88-385
- Decided
- May 15, 1989
- Argued
- March 27, 1989
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Altered precedent
- Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Rodriguez de Quijas et al. v. Shearson/american Express, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1988-088, docket 1988-088-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Bob Reves v. Ernst & Young
- Pinter v. Dahl
- Basic Incorporated v. Max L. Levinson
- Jill S. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
- Lampf v. John Gilbertson
- Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Doris I. Sandberg
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Carpenter v. United States
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
- Bateman Eichler v. Berner
- Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Rubin v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Goldberg v. Sweet
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission of Webster CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director
- Massachusetts v. Morash
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error