CaseTrail

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director

490 U.S. 66 · Decided April 3, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director was decided on April 3, 1989 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
490 U.S. 66 · 109 S. Ct. 1617 · 104 L. Ed. 2d 58 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1738
Docket number
87-453
Decided
April 3, 1989
Argued
November 29, 1988
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
8–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Harry A. Blackmun
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Appeal
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Did not participate: Sandra Day O'Connor.

Full case caption

Amerada Hess Corp. et al. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the Treasury

SCDB identifiers: case 1988-069, docket 1988-069-01.

Other cases on “State or local government tax”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error