Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director
490 U.S. 66 · Decided April 3, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director was decided on April 3, 1989 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 490 U.S. 66 · 109 S. Ct. 1617 · 104 L. Ed. 2d 58 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1738
- Docket number
- 87-453
- Decided
- April 3, 1989
- Argued
- November 29, 1988
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Did not participate: Sandra Day O'Connor.
Full case caption
Amerada Hess Corp. et al. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the Treasury
SCDB identifiers: case 1988-069, docket 1988-069-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission of Webster CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Goldberg v. Sweet
- New Energy Company of Indiana v. LimbachLaw held unconstitutional
- D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamara
- McKesson Corporation v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Maurice Smith
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Healy v. the Beer InstituteAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corporation of America
- Maine v. Taylor
- State of Wyoming v. State of OklahomaLaw held unconstitutional
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Goldberg v. Sweet
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission of Webster CountyLaw held unconstitutional
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
- Massachusetts v. Morash
- Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error