Basic Incorporated v. Max L. Levinson
485 U.S. 224 · Decided March 7, 1988 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Basic Incorporated v. Max L. Levinson was decided on March 7, 1988 by a vote of 4–2. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 485 U.S. 224 · 108 S. Ct. 978 · 99 L. Ed. 2d 194 · 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1197
- Docket number
- 86-279
- Decided
- March 7, 1988
- Argued
- November 2, 1987
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 4–2
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent |
Did not participate: William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy.
Full case caption
Basic Incorporated, et al. v. Max L. Levinson et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1987-046, docket 1987-046-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Pinter v. Dahl
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Association
- Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/american Express, Inc.Altered precedent
- Randall v. Loftsgaarden
- Bob Reves v. Ernst & Young
- Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Carpenter v. United States
- Bateman Eichler v. Berner
- Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Rubin v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.
- Mullins Coal Co., Inc. of Virginia v. Director
- Westfall v. Erwin et Ux.
- United Savings Association of Texas v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.
- United States v. Fausto
- Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co., Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error