Lampf v. John Gilbertson
501 U.S. 350 · Decided June 20, 1991 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Lampf v. John Gilbertson was decided on June 20, 1991 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 501 U.S. 350 · 111 S. Ct. 2773 · 115 L. Ed. 2d 321 · 1991 U.S. LEXIS 3629
- Docket number
- 90-333
- Decided
- June 20, 1991
- Argued
- February 19, 1991
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Dissent |
Full case caption
Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. John Gilbertson, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1990-110, docket 1990-110-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Doris I. Sandberg
- Jill S. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.
- Bob Reves v. Ernst & Young
- Musick v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
- Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/american Express, Inc.Altered precedent
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A. and Jack K. Naber
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
- Carpenter v. United States
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Bateman Eichler v. Berner
- Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
- Rubin v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Mercedel W. Miles v. Apex Marine Corporation
- Jay Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.
- Arcadia v. Ohio Power Company
- Coy R. Grogan v. Frank J. Garner, Jr.
- McDermott International, Inc. v. Jon C. Wilander
- Trinova Corporation v. Michigan Department of Treasury
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error