Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
472 U.S. 1 · Decided June 4, 1985 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc. was decided on June 4, 1985 unanimously (7–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 472 U.S. 1 · 105 S. Ct. 2458 · 86 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1985 U.S. LEXIS 124
- Docket number
- 83-2129
- Decided
- June 4, 1985
- Argued
- January 9, 1985
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Did not participate: Lewis F. Powell Jr., Sandra Day O'Connor.
Full case caption
Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1984-113, docket 1984-113-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Lowe v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Bateman Eichler v. Berner
- Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
- Japan Whaling Association v. American Cetacean Society
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth
- Gould v. Ruefenacht
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.
- Randall v. Loftsgaarden
- Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Herman & Maclean v. Huddleston
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder
- Park 'n Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park and Fly, Inc.
- Ohio v. Kovacs
- Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd
- Air France v. Saks
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error