Wittman v. Personhuballah
578 U.S. 539 · Decided May 23, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Wittman v. Personhuballah was decided on May 23, 2016 unanimously (8–0). SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, legal injury” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 578 U.S. 539 · 136 S. Ct. 3353 · 195 L. Ed. 2d 37 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3353
- Docket number
- 14-1504
- Decided
- May 23, 2016
- Argued
- March 21, 2016
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Stephen G. Breyer
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Standing, legal injury
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Wittman v. Personhuballah
SCDB identifiers: case 2015-049, docket 2015-049-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Standing, legal injury”
- Jesner v. Arab Bank
- Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill
- Esther Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
- Nestle USA v. Doe I
- Transunion LLC v. Ramirez
- Sprint Communs. Co., L.P. v. Apcc Servs.
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
- Americold Logistics, LLC v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
- Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates
- Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
- United States v. Sanchez-Gomez
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Shapiro v. McManus
- Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez
- Duncan v. Owens
- Americold Logistics, LLC v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
- Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
- Merrill Lynch v. Manning
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error