Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders
564 U.S. 135 · Decided June 13, 2011 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders was decided on June 13, 2011 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 564 U.S. 135 · 131 S. Ct. 2296 · 180 L. Ed. 2d 166 · 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4380
- Docket number
- 09-525
- Decided
- June 13, 2011
- Argued
- December 7, 2010
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent |
Full case caption
Janus Capital Group, Inc., et Al., Petitioners v. First Derivative Traders
SCDB identifiers: case 2010-063, docket 2010-063-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. James Siracusano
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Vanessa Simmonds
- Robert Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Richard Reynolds
- Jerry N. Jones v. Harris Associates L. P.
- Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Glen Billing
- Merrill Lynch v. Manning
- Salman v. United States
- Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Omega, S.A.
- Jason M. Ransom v. Fia Card Services, N.A.
- Chase Bank USA, Na. v. James A. McCoy
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. James Siracusano
- AT&T Mobility LLC v. Vincent Concepcion
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error