AT&T Mobility LLC v. Vincent Concepcion
563 U.S. 333 · Decided April 27, 2011 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Vincent Concepcion was decided on April 27, 2011 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Arbitration (non-labor)” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 563 U.S. 333 · 131 S. Ct. 1740 · 179 L. Ed. 2d 742 · 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3367
- Docket number
- 09-893
- Decided
- April 27, 2011
- Argued
- November 9, 2010
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Arbitration (non-labor)
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent |
Full case caption
AT&T Mobility LLC, Petitioner v. Vincent Concepcion
SCDB identifiers: case 2010-040, docket 2010-040-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Arbitration (non-labor)”
- KPMG LLP v. Robert Cocchi
- Compucredit Corporation v. Wanda Greenwood
- Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Clayton Brown
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. Animalfeeds International Corp.
- Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John Ivan Sutter
- American Express Company v. Italian Colors Restaurant
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Arbitration Act
- Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Eddie Lee Howard
- Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
- New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira
- Lamps Plus Inc. v. Varela
- Badgerow v. Walters
- Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Omega, S.A.
- Jason M. Ransom v. Fia Card Services, N.A.
- Chase Bank USA, Na. v. James A. McCoy
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. James Siracusano
- Cigna Corporation v. Janice C. Amara
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error