Robert Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.
561 U.S. 247 · Decided June 24, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Robert Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. was decided on June 24, 2010 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Securities regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 561 U.S. 247 · 130 S. Ct. 2869 · 177 L. Ed. 2d 535 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 5257
- Docket number
- 08-1191
- Decided
- June 24, 2010
- Argued
- March 29, 2010
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Securities regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority |
Did not participate: Sonia Sotomayor.
Full case caption
Robert Morrison, et al. v. National Australia Bank Ltd. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2009-082, docket 2009-082-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Securities regulation”
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Richard Reynolds
- Jerry N. Jones v. Harris Associates L. P.
- Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. James Siracusano
- Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Vanessa Simmonds
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Williams Act
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Glen Billing
- Merrill Lynch v. Manning
- Salman v. United States
- Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz Securities
- Ed Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Keith R. Gollust v. Ira L. Mendell, Etc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission
- Hemi Group, LLC and Kai Gachupin v. City of New York
- Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co. LLC
- Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Irvin Muchnick
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Francisco J. Espinosa
- Jerry N. Jones v. Harris Associates L. P.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error