In re United States
138 S. Ct. 443 · Decided December 20, 2017 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
In re United States was decided on December 20, 2017 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2017
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 17-801
Case details
- Citations
- 138 S. Ct. 443 · 199 L. Ed. 2d 351 · 2017 U.S. LEXIS 7504
- Docket number
- 17-801
- Decided
- December 20, 2017
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Unspecifiable what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority |
Full case caption
In re United States
SCDB identifiers: case 2017-053, docket 2017-053-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal district or territorial courts”
- Patchak v. Zinke
- Benisek v. Lamone
- Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger
- Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.
- Jam v. Int'l Finance Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
- Department of Commerce v. New York
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoAltered precedent
- Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
- Mullin v. Doe
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
- National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
- Artis v. District of Columbia
- Patchak v. Zinke
- Hall v. Hall
- Kisela v. Hughes
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error