D. Grant Peacock v. Jack L. Thomas
516 U.S. 349 · Decided February 21, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
D. Grant Peacock v. Jack L. Thomas was decided on February 21, 1996 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employee Retirement Income Security Act” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 516 U.S. 349 · 116 S. Ct. 862 · 133 L. Ed. 2d 817 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 1378
- Docket number
- 94-1453
- Decided
- February 21, 1996
- Argued
- November 6, 1995
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Clarence Thomas
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
D. Grant Peacock v. Jack L. Thomas
SCDB identifiers: case 1995-024, docket 1995-024-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”
- Varity Corporation v. Charles Howe
- Lockheed Corporation v. Paul L. Spink
- Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen
- Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company and Stroh Brewery Company
- Inter-Modal Rail Employees Association v. Atchison
- Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corporation of California, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Company
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A., Inc.
- Barbara A. de Buono v. Nysa-Ila Medical and Clinical Services Fund, Etc.
- Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs
- The District of Columbia and Sharon Pratt Kelly v. the Greater Washington Board of Trade
- Donna Rae Egelhoff v. Samantha Egelhoff
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Citizens Bank of Maryland v. David Strumpf
- William Field and Norinne Field v. Philip W. Mans
- Yamaha Motor Corporation, U. S. A. v. Lucien B. Calhoun
- Marjorie Zicherman, Etc. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
- Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc.
- Bank One Chicago, N. A. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Company
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error