Marjorie Zicherman, Etc. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
516 U.S. 217 · Decided January 16, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Marjorie Zicherman, Etc. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. was decided on January 16, 1996 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part and reversed or vacated it in part. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Election of remedies” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 516 U.S. 217 · 116 S. Ct. 629 · 133 L. Ed. 2d 596 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 469
- Docket number
- 94-1361
- Decided
- January 16, 1996
- Argued
- November 7, 1995
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Election of remedies
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Treaty
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Marjorie Zicherman, Etc., et al. v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
SCDB identifiers: case 1995-016, docket 1995-016-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Election of remedies”
- Yamaha Motor Corporation, U. S. A. v. Lucien B. Calhoun
- Vimar Seguros Y Reaseguros, S. A. v. M/v Sky Reefer
- Metropolitan Stevedore Company v. John Rambo
- Antonio Mastrobuono and Diana G. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
- Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Director
- Metropolitan Stevedore Company v. John Rambo
Cases on the same legal provision: Treaty
- United States v. Humberto Alvarez-Machain
- Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd
- Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.
- United States v. Stuart
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk
- Olympic Airways v. Rubina Husain
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Citizens Bank of Maryland v. David Strumpf
- William Field and Norinne Field v. Philip W. Mans
- Yamaha Motor Corporation, U. S. A. v. Lucien B. Calhoun
- Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc.
- Bank One Chicago, N. A. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Company
- Fulton Corporation v. Janice H. FaulknerAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error