CaseTrail

Yamaha Motor Corporation, U. S. A. v. Lucien B. Calhoun

516 U.S. 199 · Decided January 9, 1996 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Yamaha Motor Corporation, U. S. A. v. Lucien B. Calhoun was decided on January 9, 1996 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Election of remedies” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
516 U.S. 199 · 116 S. Ct. 619 · 133 L. Ed. 2d 578 · 1996 U.S. LEXIS 463
Docket number
94-1387
Decided
January 9, 1996
Argued
October 31, 1995
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. § 1292
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Yamaha Motor Corporation, U. S. A., et al. v. Lucien B. Calhoun, et Al., Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Calhoun, Deceased

SCDB identifiers: case 1995-015, docket 1995-015-01.

Other cases on “Election of remedies”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error