Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs
520 U.S. 833 · Decided June 2, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs was decided on June 2, 1997 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 520 U.S. 833 · 117 S. Ct. 1754 · 138 L. Ed. 2d 45 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 3396
- Docket number
- 96-79
- Decided
- June 2, 1997
- Argued
- January 15, 1997
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Anthony M. Kennedy
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs
SCDB identifiers: case 1996-065, docket 1996-065-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”
- Barbara A. de Buono v. Nysa-Ila Medical and Clinical Services Fund, Etc.
- Marian Johnson v. Kristine L. Fankell
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A., Inc.
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. and Nick Lombardi v. Paul Casarotto et Ux.
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.
- Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. Bill Nelson
Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- Inter-Modal Rail Employees Association v. Atchison
- Lockheed Corporation v. Paul L. Spink
- Bonnie L. Geissal v. Moore Medical Corporation
- Varity Corporation v. Charles Howe
- D. Grant Peacock v. Jack L. Thomas
- Hughes Aircraft Company v. Stanley I. Jacobson
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A., Inc.
- Barbara A. de Buono v. Nysa-Ila Medical and Clinical Services Fund, Etc.
- Marian Johnson v. Kristine L. Fankell
- United States of America v. State of Alaska
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho, Etc.
- Jay Printz v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error