CaseTrail

Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen

514 U.S. 73 · Decided March 6, 1995 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen was decided on March 6, 1995 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employee Retirement Income Security Act” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
514 U.S. 73 · 115 S. Ct. 1223 · 131 L. Ed. 2d 94 · 1995 U.S. LEXIS 1807
Docket number
93-1935
Decided
March 6, 1995
Argued
January 17, 1995
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Sandra Day O'Connor
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen, et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1994-032, docket 1994-032-01.

Other cases on “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error