Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen
514 U.S. 73 · Decided March 6, 1995 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen was decided on March 6, 1995 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employee Retirement Income Security Act” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 514 U.S. 73 · 115 S. Ct. 1223 · 131 L. Ed. 2d 94 · 1995 U.S. LEXIS 1807
- Docket number
- 93-1935
- Decided
- March 6, 1995
- Argued
- January 17, 1995
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Frank C. Schoonejongen, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1994-032, docket 1994-032-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”
- Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company and Stroh Brewery Company
- D. Grant Peacock v. Jack L. Thomas
- Varity Corporation v. Charles Howe
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank
- Lockheed Corporation v. Paul L. Spink
- Concrete Pipe and Products of California, Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California
Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Company
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A., Inc.
- The District of Columbia and Sharon Pratt Kelly v. the Greater Washington Board of Trade
- Barbara A. de Buono v. Nysa-Ila Medical and Clinical Services Fund, Etc.
- Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs
- Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Perry McClendon
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Albert Hess and Charles F. Walsh v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation
- Charles J. Reich v. Marcus E. CollinsLaw held unconstitutional
- Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer
- Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Company and Stroh Brewery Company
- Arthur L. Gustafson v. Alloyd Company
- Antonio Mastrobuono and Diana G. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error