Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission
458 U.S. 307 · Decided June 29, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission was decided on June 29, 1982 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 458 U.S. 307 · 102 S. Ct. 3103 · 73 L. Ed. 2d 787 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 46
- Docket number
- 80-2015
- Decided
- June 29, 1982
- Argued
- April 19, 1982
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-157, docket 1981-157-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New MexicoLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. New Mexico
- Xerox Corp. v. County of Harris
- Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Garner
- Washington v. United States
- Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Blum v. Yaretsky
- Youngberg v. Romeo
- Insurance Corporation of Ireland, Ltd. v. Compagnie Des Bauxites de Guinee
- Greene v. LindseyLaw held unconstitutional
- Santosky v. KramerLaw held unconstitutional
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Watt v. Energy Action Educational Foundation
- Central Trust Co. v. Official Creditors' Committee of Geiger Enterprises, Inc.
- United States v. Clark
- Community Communications Co., Inc. v. City of Boulder
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error