United States v. New Mexico
455 U.S. 720 · Decided March 24, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. New Mexico was decided on March 24, 1982 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 455 U.S. 720 · 102 S. Ct. 1373 · 71 L. Ed. 2d 580 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 31
- Docket number
- 80-702
- Decided
- March 24, 1982
- Argued
- December 8, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. New Mexico et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-068, docket 1981-068-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Department of New MexicoLaw held unconstitutional
- Xerox Corp. v. County of Harris
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaAltered precedent
- Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California
- Maryland v. LouisianaLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- Blum v. BaconLaw held unconstitutional
- Toll v. Moreno
- Lawrence County v. Lead-Deadwood School District No. 40-1Law held unconstitutional
- General Atomic Co. v. Felter
- Rose v. Arkansas State PoliceLaw held unconstitutional
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Watt v. Energy Action Educational Foundation
- Central Trust Co. v. Official Creditors' Committee of Geiger Enterprises, Inc.
- United States v. Clark
- Community Communications Co., Inc. v. City of Boulder
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error