Washington v. United States
460 U.S. 536 · Decided March 29, 1983 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Washington v. United States was decided on March 29, 1983 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 460 U.S. 536 · 103 S. Ct. 1344 · 75 L. Ed. 2d 264 · 1983 U.S. LEXIS 20
- Docket number
- 81-969
- Decided
- March 29, 1983
- Argued
- January 10, 1983
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Washington et al. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1982-048, docket 1982-048-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Garner
- Exxon Corp. v. Eagerton
- Container Corporation of America v. Franchise Tax Board
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Dallas County
- Xerox Corp. v. County of Harris
- Asarco Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article VI, Section 2 (supremacy clause)
- Toll v. Moreno
- Blum v. BaconLaw held unconstitutional
- Lawrence County v. Lead-Deadwood School District No. 40-1Law held unconstitutional
- Rose v. Arkansas State PoliceLaw held unconstitutional
- Rose v. Rose
- George S. Bennett v. ArkansasLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- United States v. Security Industrial Bank
- Xerox Corp. v. County of Harris
- Director v. Perini North River Associates
- Herman & Maclean v. Huddleston
- Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Garner
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error