G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn
455 U.S. 404 · Decided February 24, 1982 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn was decided on February 24, 1982 by a vote of 8–1. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Harry A. Blackmun wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 455 U.S. 404 · 102 S. Ct. 1137 · 71 L. Ed. 2d 250 · 1982 U.S. LEXIS 74
- Docket number
- 80-644
- Decided
- February 24, 1982
- Argued
- December 7, 1981
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Harry A. Blackmun
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Special concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
G.D. Searle & Co. v. Cohn et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1981-049, docket 1981-049-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Law held unconstitutional
- Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.
- Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corporation of DelawareLaw held unconstitutional
- White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Mills v. HabluetzelLaw held unconstitutional
- Cabell v. Chavez-Salido
- Zobel et Ux. v. WilliamsLaw held unconstitutional
- Plyler v. DoeLaw held unconstitutional
- Washington v. Seattle School District No. 1Law held unconstitutional
- Crawford v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Watt v. Energy Action Educational Foundation
- Central Trust Co. v. Official Creditors' Committee of Geiger Enterprises, Inc.
- United States v. Clark
- Community Communications Co., Inc. v. City of Boulder
- New England Power Co. v. New HampshireLaw held unconstitutional
- Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. GibbonsLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error